Tuesday, March 23, 2010
The new health-care law
The infant mortality rate in some of the rural counties of Oklahoma is shockingly high. If there is anything in the new law that, properly implemented, will bring these rates down, then that provision of the new law is to be welcomed.
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Public Knowledge's 5-point plan for copyright reform
Public Knowledge has released a five-point plan for copyright reform that they intend to be the basis of a legislative proposal. The pillars of this plan are:
1) strengthen fair use, including reforming outrageously high statutory damages, which deter innovation and creativity;
2) reform the DMCA to permit circumvention of digital locks for lawful purposes;
3) update the limitations and exceptions to copyright protection to better conform with how digital technologies work;
4) provide recourse for people and companies who are recklessly accused of copyright infringement and who are recklessly sent improper DMCA take-down notices; and
5) streamline arcane music licensing laws to encourage new and better business models for selling music.
Before anything, though, else we need a shorter copyright term. I would consider duration to be implicit in point 3, limitations on copyright. But it is not clear that the folks at Public Knowledge think so. In this article, for example, under "What are the limits of copyright?", they mention only limitations on copyright's scope-- fair use and first sale. Duration is mentioned under the heading "why do we have copyright?" So it seems that the folks at public knowledge don't consider a shorter term of copyright to be part of their 5-point plan, even implicitly. What a disappointment.
1) strengthen fair use, including reforming outrageously high statutory damages, which deter innovation and creativity;
2) reform the DMCA to permit circumvention of digital locks for lawful purposes;
3) update the limitations and exceptions to copyright protection to better conform with how digital technologies work;
4) provide recourse for people and companies who are recklessly accused of copyright infringement and who are recklessly sent improper DMCA take-down notices; and
5) streamline arcane music licensing laws to encourage new and better business models for selling music.
Before anything, though, else we need a shorter copyright term. I would consider duration to be implicit in point 3, limitations on copyright. But it is not clear that the folks at Public Knowledge think so. In this article, for example, under "What are the limits of copyright?", they mention only limitations on copyright's scope-- fair use and first sale. Duration is mentioned under the heading "why do we have copyright?" So it seems that the folks at public knowledge don't consider a shorter term of copyright to be part of their 5-point plan, even implicitly. What a disappointment.
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Ice storm!
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!
Connecticut, 1665:
[A] solemne day of Thanksgiving to be kept throwout this Colony on the last Wednesday of November, to returne praise to God for his great mercy to us in the continuation of our liberties and priviledges both Civill and Ecclesiastick; and for our peace and preventing those troubles that we feard by forreigne enemies; and for the blessings in the fruits of the earth and the generall health in the plantations.Oklahoma, 2009: The blessings continue.
--J. Hammond Trumbull, Ed., The Public Records of the Colony of Connecticut from 1665 to 1678, P.A. Brown, Hartford, 1852, page 26.
Saturday, November 21, 2009
The Queen's Government proves itself utterly clueless
The Government of the U.K. has released details of the proposal known as the Digital Economy Bill. The bill contains a number of proposals involving the maintenance and upgrade of the UK's national digital computer network. Lurking among other proposals that might be reasonable is, however, is the following clunker:
creating a robust legal and regulatory framework to combat illegal file sharing and other forms of online copyright infringement and give Ofcom a specific new responsibility to significantly reduce this practice, including two specific obligations on Internet Service Providers: the notification of unlawful activity and, for alleged serial-infringers, collation of data to allow rights holders to obtain court orders to force the release of personal details, enabling legal action to be taken against them;As discussed here, this will require internet service providers to serve as the entertainment syndicates' private copyright cops. Lousy public policy all around.
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Ph34r t3h cute ones (fear the cute ones)
Don't these dancers look dangerous as they wade through water and rain in warriors' weeds?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

