Public Knowledge has released a five-point plan for copyright reform that they intend to be the basis of a legislative proposal. The pillars of this plan are:
1) strengthen fair use, including reforming outrageously high statutory damages, which deter innovation and creativity;
2) reform the DMCA to permit circumvention of digital locks for lawful purposes;
3) update the limitations and exceptions to copyright protection to better conform with how digital technologies work;
4) provide recourse for people and companies who are recklessly accused of copyright infringement and who are recklessly sent improper DMCA take-down notices; and
5) streamline arcane music licensing laws to encourage new and better business models for selling music.
Before anything, though, else we need a shorter copyright term. I would consider duration to be implicit in point 3, limitations on copyright. But it is not clear that the folks at Public Knowledge think so. In this article, for example, under "What are the limits of copyright?", they mention only limitations on copyright's scope-- fair use and first sale. Duration is mentioned under the heading "why do we have copyright?" So it seems that the folks at public knowledge don't consider a shorter term of copyright to be part of their 5-point plan, even implicitly. What a disappointment.